There are a number of critical appraisal tools that are designed to be used when reading and evaluating research and clinical studies. We have included examples of how to reference some of the common tools here. |
General Notes: |
|
CASP checklists |
Corporate Author. (Year). Title of document: Subtitle. https://www... |
Reference list entry:
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2018). CASP systematic review checklist. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/
In-text citation:
(Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, 2018)
Where more than one checklist is needed for referencing, refer to the information under Year/Date on the page for the Reference list.
General Notes: |
|
JBI checklists |
Corporate Author. (Year). Title of document: Subtitle. https://www... |
Joanna Briggs Institute. (2017). Checklist for systematic reviews and research syntheses. https://joannabriggs.org/ebp/critical_appraisal_tools
(Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017)
Where more than one checklist is needed for referencing, refer to the information under Year/Date on the page for the Reference list.
General Notes: |
|
STROBE Statement |
1st Author Surname, Initial., 2nd Author Surname, Initial., 3rd Author Surname, Initial., 4th Author Surname, Initial., 5th Author Surname, Initial., & 6th Author Surname, Initial. (Year). Article title: Subtitle. Journal Title, Volume(Issue), Page-Page. https://doi.org/10.xxxx |
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gotzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke J. P. (2008). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(4):344-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008
As the article above has 6 authors, a shortened in-text citation is used:
(von Elm et al., 2008)
General Notes: |
|
Cochrane Handbook Tools |
Reference as you would a chapter in an edited book |
Higgins, J. P. T., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., & Sterne, J. A. C. (2019). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. In J. P. T. Higgins et al. (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 6.0). Cochrane. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-08
Reitsma, J. B., Rutjes, A. W. S., Whiting, P., Vlassov, V. V., Leeflang, M. M. G., & Deeks, J. J. (2009). Assessing methodological quality. In J. J. Deeks, P. M. Bossuyt, & C. Gatsonis (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Cochrane Collaboration. https://methods.cochrane.org/sdt/handbook-dta-reviews
As the chapters above both have more than 3 authors, a shortened in-text citation is used:
(Higgins et al., 2019)
(Reitsma et al., 2009)
General Notes: |
|
PEDro scale |
Title of document. (Year). https://www... |
PEDro scale. (1999). http://www.pedro.org.au/wp-content/uploads/PEDro_scale.pdf
As there is no author listed, the italicised title is used for the citation:
(PEDro scale, 1999)
General Notes: |
|
Downs & Black checklist |
1st Author Surname, Initial., & 2nd Author Surname, Initial. (Year). Article title: Subtitle. Journal Title, Volume(Issue), Page-Page. https://doi.org/10.xxxx |
Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 52(6), 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.52.6.377
(Downs & Black, 1998)