
From Study essentials - AI in Assessment:
Students should read the University's Policy on the use of Generative AI in Teaching, Learning and Assessment to better understand their responsibilities around academic integrity and the use of AI in courses and assessment. The following PDF slides (April 2024) present the University’s overarching position on the use of AI by students. Scroll on the right:
Your course coordinator should provide guidance around the use of genAI in your course's assessable and other tasks. You may see the following visual cues:



Note that options for use may vary within your course for different assessments. Don't assume that all assessments will allow for use of genAI tools. Do not use genAI in any way that contradicts instructions from your course coordinators - if you are unsure, ask.
Some ways that you could use genAI tools ethically (within the parameters allowed for students). Ask or use the tool to:
![Here's an example prompt to try, after which you can have a whole conversation where ChatGPT will answer what you write (in French or English) in French, followed by an English translation. PROMPT: "Have a conversation with me. Please write your answers in French and then add an English translation. I heard it will rain later." OUTPUT: "[text in French, then translation] It seems that it will rain later. That's a shame, I'd like to go out for a walk."](https://libapps-au.s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/accounts/30671/images/ChatGPT_example1.png)
Screenshot from Generative artificial intelligence technologies and teaching and learning by Monash University, licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Screenshot taken from Copilot, response generated 25 March 2024 [response shown is incomplete for space reasons]
Our Writing prompts page includes other ethical uses: 12 ways to use genAI prompts for learning
For more see:
Academic integrity and genAI in your assessments
AskUON knowledgebase articles on the use of genAI
Visualising the 1800s or designing wedding invitations: 6 ways you can use AI beyond generating text (The Conversation, April 2024)
The University provides free access for staff and students to the premium version of Copilot; sign in using your University Microsoft account details.
Copilot can also be accessed via the icon in the Edge browser, top right, along from the URL bar.
Copilot draws from GPT-4 and is connected to the Internet so its responses have more chance of using up-to-date sources. Copilot also provides links to where it obtained information, which can aid in checking for authority and accuracy (this is important to do!). Image generation is also possible via Copilot's integration Designer (powered by DALL-E).
The University's access to Copilot provides enterprise protection for your data and does not use your prompts to train the language model or system. Your prompts and Copilot's responses are now saved for 90 days, under enterprise data protection.
It's important to check for the shield icon top-right of window to ensure that you're logged in through the University's access. If you hover your mouse over the shield it should read: "Enterprise data protection applies to this chat", as shown right.
Update 21 August 2025: Microsoft has added opt-in access to GPT-5. To enable GPT-5, users currently need to click the button shown right. The button will then display as 'GPT-5 On'.

Our Writing Prompts page has information from Microsoft on how to get the best out of Copilot.
To learn more about Copilot:
Writing Feedback+ is the free AI-powered feedback service that provides 24/7 personalised feedback on writing, grammar, structure, and critical thinking. The service is available via the Studiosity learning support platform (see Need Help? in Canvas) and allows for unlimited submissions.
While Writing Feedback+ is AI-based, it is not a generation tool like Copilot/ChatGPT/etc. No changes are made to student submissions, as can be the case with other tools that create edits or 'fixes'. This service simply provides helpful advice and suggestions on how to improve the submitted text. Students have control over changes to their writing, making this an ethical and responsible choice for all written assignments. In addition, student submissions are not used to train the platform so data security is not an issue.
Language editing tools, such as Grammarly, can be useful to improve the expression of academic writing. However, it’s always best to check with your course coordinator whether such tools are allowable in a particular assignment.
In particular, the genAI functionality that Grammarly now incorporates should only be used if your Course Coordinator has permitted use of generative AI in the assessment. If you are not sure, you should always ask your Course Coordinator.
If AI is not allowed in a particular assessment, you should make sure that Grammarly's genAI settings are turned off via the Feature Customisation page for your account before use.
Turnitin’s Artificial Intelligence Detection may flag use of Grammarly in written submissions, and drafts of your work can be a useful part of any discussions around your learning and assessment. If you are using Grammarly or similar tools, make sure that you always retain drafts/versions of your work as evidence of how you have constructed your final submission.
See How do I turn on AutoSave? and View previous versions of a file for Microsoft products such as Excel, PowerPoint or Word. Or, you could save a copy of your original draft under a different file name and use this copy with Grammarly so that the AI changes are restricted to a distinct version.
Please note that AI features offered by tools like Grammarly, such as 'grader' and 'detector', should not be relied upon for accuracy. Course materials, including assessment documents and rubrics, must not be uploaded to any AI tools unless the tool is endorsed by the University (see Uploading files to genAI).
There are important considerations around uploading files to genAI tools.
As noted above for files, data security/privacy is a big concern for genAI systems. To ensure that any information you provide in an input does not become part of the AI tool's training data, you should check what is being shared, and whether you can opt out.
The JISC National Centre for AI (UK) has a great summary to help with navigating the terms and conditions of genAI tools across text, image, audio and video generation, plus others, that makes it easier to see what is being shared and whether you can opt out. It's also important to check after any updates/upgrades to the platform that you are still not sahring your information more broadly, otherwise it could become part of a later output and used by someone else.
Note that the University's enterprise access to Copilot includes data security that is highly visible when you log in, top right of screen.
To be safe, it's always best to limit any personal or potentially sensitive information shared with a genAI tool, so being careful when creating CVs and personal or oral histories. Consideration should also be given to uploading interview transcripts and similar materials.
HDR students may have additional considerations from working in research spaces. HDR students and their supervisors should read the guidance for Generative Artificial Intelligence and Higher Degrees by Research (PDF). See also our page on AI for Research.
|
|
We'd love to hear your feedback on this portal. If you think changes could be made, or more information added, please visit our feedback page.